Beijing Delivers Retaliation Threat to British Government Over External Interference Rules
According to multiple government sources, China has reportedly threatened to respond against the United Kingdom if officials move to designate certain elements of its security infrastructure under recently established external lobbying disclosure rules.
Bilateral Tensions Intensify
Beijing officials reportedly communicated this message to the British diplomatic corps soon following news surfaced that the British administration was contemplating such actions. This development has heightened concerns given the administration's continued hesitance to apply stricter external lobbying regulations on lobbyists acting for Beijing or any branch of the Chinese state.
Current Foreign Influence Registration Scheme
At present, only the Russian Federation and the Islamic Republic have been included in the stricter tier of the external lobbying registry (Firs), which was launched in July and was fully implemented this month. This framework requires all individuals in the United Kingdom representing a external government or organization to declare their activities to the government or risk criminal sanctions.
- The enhanced tier covers nations and organizations considered a significant threat.
- It requires extra disclosures beyond the standard requirements.
- Consequently, any individual conducting unregistered work on behalf of Iran or Moscow faces up to five years in jail.
Potential Designations
Earlier this year, sources suggested that instead of designating Beijing as a complete entity, ministers were considering adding specific components of the Chinese political system that have been accused of interference in European and North American nations to the stricter tier.
Such organizations allegedly include:
- China's Ministry of State Security
- The Chinese Communist party (CCP)
- The United Front Work Department
- China's military forces (PLA)
Dismissed Espionage Trial
Simultaneously, the administration is under increasing pressure over the recent dismissal of an espionage trial involving two Britons, including a former parliamentary researcher. the first defendant, a former parliamentary aide to Tory parliamentarians, and his associate the second defendant had been accused of spying for Beijing.
Their trial was unexpectedly dropped by the Crown Prosecution Service in mid-September. Both defendants had denied the allegations.
Judicial Complications
Media reports indicated that the government's unwillingness to officially characterize China as an "adversarial state" in witness evidence from a security official led to the trial's dismissal. Jonathan Powell, the prime minister's national security adviser, reportedly led a discussion in Whitehall where he informed officials that the government's evidence would stop well short of calling Beijing an enemy.
Official insiders subsequently rejected the allegation that Powell was responsible for limiting official testimony.
The legal complication stemmed from the Official Secrets Act of 1911, which specifies that a person is responsible for spying if they pass on information "directly or indirectly useful to an enemy". However, the current government's security policy describes China as a "strategic competitor" rather than an enemy.
Continuing Diplomatic Engagement
Despite these disagreements, UK-China diplomatic ties appear to be improving. Multiple senior government figures have visited China on official visits since the new government came to power. These include the business secretary, who participated in trade talks last month, and Jonathan Powell, who traveled during the summer.
Additionally, discussions have supposedly taken place between diplomatic corps representatives and parliamentary leadership regarding the prospect of lifting the prohibition on the Chinese ambassador entering the legislature, potentially in exchange for China removing its restrictions on British legislators.
Prime Minister Keir Starmer is widely expected to undertake a bilateral trip to Beijing in the beginning of the coming year, though the specific schedule might be influenced by global developments, including a possible trip by ex-American leader the Republican figure.